User Menu
Publication Ethics and Policies
Principles, responsibilities, and procedures supporting responsible scholarly publishing.
Commitment to Publication Integrity
Jurnal Riset Kimia (JRK) is committed to maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. Authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher are expected to act honestly, disclose relevant interests, respect research participants and research materials, and correct the record when necessary. The journal considers concerns including plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated or falsified data, inappropriate image manipulation, undisclosed conflicts of interest, authorship disputes, citation manipulation, and breaches of research ethics.
Reporting and Handling Concerns
Concerns may be sent to the Editor-in-Chief through the contact details on the journal website. JRK will assess concerns fairly and confidentially, preserve relevant records, and follow applicable Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidance where appropriate.
A person directly implicated in a concern must not handle it. Those whose conduct is questioned will be given a reasonable opportunity to respond before an adverse decision is made, except where immediate action is needed to protect individuals or the scholarly record. The journal may consult institutions, funders, or other competent bodies when an investigation falls beyond its remit.
Reporting contact: JRK Contact Page
Editorial Independence and Accountability
Editorial decisions are based on journal scope, peer-review evidence, research integrity, and scholarly merit. Editors and reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when impartiality cannot be assured. Fees, sponsorship, advertising, and institutional relationships must not determine editorial decisions.
When warranted by evidence, JRK may reject manuscripts or issue corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern about published material. Its policies apply to submissions, published articles, and post-publication concerns.
Detailed Publication Policies
Select a policy below to read its scope, responsibilities, and procedures.
Research & Publication Ethics
Procedures for assessing and addressing allegations of misconduct in research and publication.
Requirements for authorship, contributions, and the responsible attribution of scholarly work.
Disclosure and management of interests that could influence scholarly decisions.
Ethical standards and oversight for research reported in the journal.
Policies addressing originality, overlapping publication, and reuse of previously published text.
Standards for accurate, appropriate, and responsible citation and referencing.
Guidance on the use and disclosure of generative AI in scholarly publishing.
Ethical responsibilities of authors, reviewers, editors, and other participants in publication.
Editorial & Peer Review
The journal’s peer review process and principles for evaluating submissions.
Editorial duties, decision-making, independence, and journal governance.
Procedures for raising complaints and appealing editorial decisions.
Editorial standards for special issues and guest-edited submissions.
Research Data & Dissemination
Expectations for research data, transparent reporting, and reproducibility.
Guidance on preprints and the dissemination of work before journal publication.
Post-Publication Policies
Policies for correcting, retracting, or issuing expressions of concern about published articles.
Mechanisms for scholarly discussion and responses after publication.
Open Access & Archiving
The journal’s approach to access and reuse of published research.
Conditions for depositing and sharing versions of published work.
Measures for the long-term preservation and accessibility of journal content.
Privacy & Journal Administration
Principles governing advertising, sponsorship, and promotional activities.
Protection and confidential handling of information within journal operations.
Questions about these policies may be directed to the JRK Editorial Office. Complaints involving editorial conflicts should follow the independent review procedure described in the Complaints and Appeals policy.










